|BwN Building Blocks||BwN Toolbox||Pilots and cases||BwN Knowledge|
Much of present-day coastal infrastructure offers perspectives not only to protect the coast, but also to create suitable habitats for certain ecosystems. This can be beneficial, as natural ecosystems can contribute significantly to coastal protection and provide other services. Moreover, most ecosystems, as opposed to traditional hard structures, are able to adapt to (relative) sea-level rise.
‘Ecosystem engineers’, i.e. species that influence their own habitat, form complex structures in the subtidal and intertidal zone and can provide sustainable shoreline or shoal edge protection. Next to shellfish as described herein, other ecosystem-engineers are corals, mangroves, saltmarshes and seagrass. To successfully include ecosystem engineers in coastal protection, certain requirements have to be met for establishment and sustainable growth. Examples are requirements on hydrodynamic conditions, water quality, soil characteristics, light availability, etc., but also biological preconditions (e.g. connectivity to other or similar ecosystems). Parts of these requirements can be engineered or fostered through human intervention, while others cannot. This building block describes the habitat requirements for shellfish reefs, based on research, application and knowledge of the Pacific Oyster.
General Building Block Description
This Building Block focuses on the creation of shellfish (bivalve) reefs that change the near-bed flow and dissipate wave energy on intertidal flats, thereby influencing sediment transport, erosion and deposition. It describes the habitat requirements for shellfish reefs in soft sediment habitats, based on experience with the Pacific Oyster. The advantage of oysters compared to other shellfish such as mussels is that, due to its strong ‘cement-like’ coagulation they stay attached to the substrate after dying and are therefore capable of forming stable and sustainable reefs. This guideline can be used to check whether a certain location is suitable or can be made suitable for the establishment of oyster reefs.
- Case Shellfish Reefs. This case describes the possibilities of applying artificial oyster reefs, located in the intertidal zone in front of intertidal flats or saltmarshes, as a cost-effective and sustainable protection of intertidal habitat and – where applicable – a contribution to coastal protection in the Eastern Scheldt (SW Netherlands).
- Estuaries. Temperate intertidal soft-sediment habitats present in a lot of estuaries are ideal for the Pacific oyster.
This guideline can be used as a first-order assessment of the habitat requirements of reef forming bivalves, more specifically the Pacific Oyster. To fully assess the suitability for shellfish reefs one should have a thorough knowledge about the area of interest, as well as additional ecological expertise on the shellfish species considered and its ecosystem engineering capacity under different environmental conditions. Local hydrographic, sedimentologic, water quality and nutrient availability conditions, as well as historical data on reef occurrence and success, must be taken into account while selecting sites and developing restoration strategies.
The added value of this tool within BwN-type projects is that it enables the creation of natural coastal barriers with reef-building ecosystem engineers. Ecosystem engineers are species that modify their own environment, to their own benefit and that of other species. Thus they can be key species in the formation and persistence of structurally complex habitats. Such habitats can be used to combine the intended function, for example, coastal protection and/or associated economic and social returns with habitat restoration/conservation, for example by enhancing biodiversity.
This Building Block focuses on experiences using the Pacific Oyster (Crassostrea gigas) in temperate soft sediment habitats. Worldwide, the Pacific Oyster is one of the most widely cultured shellfish species. The preconditions for the use of - preferably indigenous- reef-forming oyster species in new habitats are best tested in the habitat concerned. This will help creating successful reefs (Mann and Powell, 2007).
Tip: In the figure below the light blue boxes show the advantages of using a shellfish reef. In the black boxes some of the main necessities for creating a shellfish reef are depicted. Clicking on the image will give you more in depth information about oyster reefs consisting of the Pacific Oyster.
- Decreases shore erosion by dissipating wave-energy.
- Traps fine sediment and organic matter
- Provides a sustainable barrier hampering sediment transport from a protected area into the adjacent channels
- Can enhance biodiversity
- Provides shelter for other species
- Water quality improvement through filtering nutrients and contaminants
- Can keep up with a (certain) rate of relative sea level rise by sediment trapping.
- Shellfish reefs only occur in temperate environments
- Contamination hampers shellfish establishment and growth
- Species that make up the shellfish reef can be an invasive species
- Can result in a shift of the benthic population
- Present (eco)system can be degraded
Habitat requirements for oyster reefs
Different oyster species have different habitat requirements. Temperate intertidal soft-sediment habitats are ideal for the Pacific Oyster, but other environmental characteristics may form bottlenecks for its survival.
The circular flowchart in Fig. 5 shows the complex interactions between the lifecycle of an oyster and the (a)biotic environmental conditions that determine the development of a natural oyster reef. The abiotic environmental conditions (white blocks: suitable substrate, wave action/flow velocity and inundation period) affect oyster performance (grey blocks: settlement, growth, survival, and reproduction) in different life stages (black blocks: larvae, spat and adults).
This Building Block describes the critical habitat requirements for these oysters based on the 4 spheres approach, stating that all four spheres (biosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere and atmosphere) interact with each other and cannot be considered on their own. The biosphere includes all living organisms, the hydrosphere relates to water in or near the earth, the lithosphere includes all solid materials, soils and rocks, and the atmosphere relates to the weather and climate. For each of these spheres the relevant parameters are described, including the critical conditions for oyster reef establishment. These values are derived from Building with Nature studies and literature. Based on these conditions a certain location may be (made) suitable for oysters.
A complete overview of the four spheres and the relevant parameters regarding oysters in these spheres is shown in the habitat requirement tree below. The background of all the parameters, including the limitations to each parameter can be found below.
Tip:select a 'sphere' in below diagram for more detailed information.
How to Use
If an ecosystem engineer is considered to be included in a design for coastal protection or coastal rehabilitation, several questions need answering:
- Is it possible to create a suitable habitat for a specific ecosystem in the project area?
- What would be the envisaged services provided by this ecosystem?
- To what extent can the ecosystem contribute to the primary function of the design and how does this affect the design itself? For example, what dimensions of a shellfish reef are needed to reduce erosion or stabilize sediment? And what dimensions to act as an efficient wave reflector?
- What effects do the ecosystem engineers in this ecosystem have on the existing physical, ecological and socio-economical system?
- What are the costs, uncertainties and risks ensuing from including these ecosystem engineers in the design?
In this Building Block, the focus lies on the habitat requirements for shellfish. The determination flowchart gives a first answer to the suitability of the project area as a habitat for shellfish. Other questions can be elaborated in subsequent or parallel steps.
The determination flowchart (Figure 10) is based on the habitat requirements described in the general introduction. The goal of the determination flowchart is to give an easy, accessible and low-cost first indication of whether a suitable habitat for shellfish exists or can be created. The flowchart can also be employed to determine if restoring or improving existing shellfish reefs is an option, as it helps finding the possible causes of shellfish degradation or development stagnation.
The potential ecosystem services of shellfish are:
- Coastal protection, e.g. by dissipating wave energy, thus reducing erosion of the protected area.
- Water quality improvement by acting as a nutrient filter, by reducing turbidity via sediment trapping, etc.
- Providing a sustainable barrier hampering sediment transport from the protected area into the adjacent channels; this barrier is able to keep up with a certain rate of (relative) sea-level rise by trapping sediments.
Other ecosystem services, such as provision, cultural and supporting services are not evaluated here. More information on these services can be found on the Environment Page.
The Case shellfish reefs of Building with Nature in the Eastern Scheldt gives further details on how to use such reefs for protecting tidal flats against erosion.
Before employing the flowchart it is important to establish which (eco)system is present in the current situation and which function(s) it holds. Creating something new always comes at the cost of what presently exists. For every type of ecosystem, like a tidal flat, coral reef, seagrass meadow or saltmarsh, it is necessary to understand that system before being able to prevent or undo its degradation. Species communities may even support each other: a coral reef, for instance, can dissipate wave energy and create a sheltered area for seagrasses. The analysis of the current system should extend beyond the project site proper and consider adjacent systems. One reason is that engineering works usually have a large influence on the sediment budget and hence on adjacent areas, another is that adjacent communities may produce seedlings for natural settling in the project area.
It is important to keep in mind that an existing (eco-)system may have other functions, such as cultural or supporting services, that may be lost by constructing something new. For example: creating a shellfish reef might be less attractive in a recreational area where people swim. If losing current functions is considered acceptable as long as a (new) shellfish reef providing the desired ecosystem services is created in return, the determination flowchart in Fig. 10 or 11 can be used.
The goal of the flowchart is to have a first answer to the following question:
‘Does the intended project area have potential to (re-)establish a sustainable shellfish reef which provides the desired ecosystem services?’
The flowchart aims to indicate whether the important habitat requirements which enable the establishment and sustainable presence of shellfish are naturally present or can be engineered. The result can only be a first-order indication, as the dynamics involved are too complex to comprise in a generic tool. If and when more precise information is needed in later project stages, local shellfish expertise should be called in.
Before employing the flowchart, several issues have to be considered. Firstly, shellfish reefs only occur in temperate environments. Secondly, the history of the proposed site can give a good indication on the suitability for creating a shellfish reef. If a reef was present in the past, but lost e.g. due to human activities, this may indicate that the environmental conditions (salinity, wave exposure etc.) are in principle suitable for creating or restoring a shellfish reef. Other causes of disappearance can give insight into the habitat requirements that need to be adjusted or created. Finally, contaminated areas will hamper shellfish establishment and growth. The possibility to remediate the water and/or soil quality should be considered first, before going through the flowchart.
When going through the flowchart, note that comments are available to interpret the provided values. Keep in mind that every location is unique and has characteristic dynamics and shellfish ecosystems are characterized by complex interactions. This makes it challenging to give precise thresholds, which explains why many habitat requirements remain to be specified.
This section describes the application of the Building Block to a practical case. The study area for this application is the Eastern Scheldt (SW Netherlands). A separate Case page exists, which describes the phases in the design and construction process of the oyster reefs in the Eastern Scheldt. In the practical application described on this page, the flowchart is discussed by explaining and applying the text and values in the balloons.
This resulted in erosion of the intertidal flats, as the tidal currents building up the flats decreased and the wave action eroding them remained the same. Since tidal flats are an important aspect of the unique ecosystem and play a key role in the stop-over function of the Eastern Scheldt in the East Atlantic Flyway for migratory birds, mitigating measures such as nourishments (see Galgeplaat nourishment) and shellfish reef construction are taken to maintain these flats. The present naturally occurring shellfish reefs in the Eastern Scheldt consist of the Pacific Oyster. This species was introduced by oyster farmers in the 1960s after mass mortality of the endemic European Flat Oyster, and occurs nowadays as wild reefs in the intertidal area (Smaal et al., 2009).
An advantage of of BwN-designs is that the natural systems they include have the ability to adapt to changing environmental conditions. Shellfish reefs are able to grow and keep up with relative sea level rise. In addition, oyster reefs may facilitate other ecosystems such as saltmarshes and seagrass meadows. This facilitation can create a cascade of ecosystem engineers that all add to a more sustainable and resilient ecosystem, hence to a higher and longer-lasting reliability of the services it provides. More information about restoring shellfish reefs can also be found on the websites Living Shorelines and Oyster Restoration.
Following the determination flowchart (Figure 11), the aim is to determine the critical habitat requirements for oysters in the Eastern Scheldt. For each parameter in the chart, information on the specific project location is needed. The following sources of information can be considered to obtain site-specific values for these parameters:
- Current state of the ecosystem on site (occurrence of species/health of species present).
- Available literature.
- Computational Modelling.
- Data collection (measurements/field work).
The hierarchy above is based on the amount of effort it usually takes to obtain information from the specific source. However, the effort can differ significantly due to factors such as local knowledge, circumstances on site, availability of measuring equipment, etc. For the Eastern Scheldt case, information is abundant as basic data on salinity, waves and water levels are available on the internet (at government websites) and experience with the construction of artificial oyster reef substrates exists.
In the following section, the flowchart is discussed from top to bottom to give the rationale concerning each habitat requirement.
Salinity - Salinity in the Eastern Scheldt is suitable for the Pacific Oyster. Salinity is in the range of 25 and 35 ppt (Davis et al., 1962, Schellekens et al., 2011). In the Netherlands, this type of data is measured and made available through a national monitoring program (MWTL - Monitoring Waterstaatkundige Toestand des Lands).
Inundation time - Inundation periods vary along the slopes of the intertidal flats. The height of a flat is depending on the local hydrodynamics. Oyster reef substrate can be placed at such a level that the inundation time is optimal. In the case of the Eastern Scheldt an exposure time of less than 30% is optimal for the oysters, while exposure time above 60% is unsuitable (Schellekens et al., 2011). This implies that artificial reefs should not be placed outside this range.
Hydrodynamic energy - In the Eastern Scheldt oyster reefs are not observed at sites with current velocities larger than 50 cm/s (Schellekens et al., 2011). This implies that artificial reefs placed at more dynamic conditions need additional fixation of the substrate. Experiments with loose oyster shells at an exposed site (Dortsman) resulted in the complete loss of the shells during stormy conditions. Here the hydrodynamic energy (mainly waves) was too high to place shells without fixation. Therefore, the use of gabions filled with oyster shells was introduced. Attachment of oyster larvae is usually not limited by hydrodynamics, but dislodging of substrate can pose a significant problem. Storm events, may destroy initially successful settlement of oyster larvae, thus preventing sustainable reef creation.
Substrate available - In the Eastern Scheldt, oyster reefs nowadays occupy about 10% of the intertidal habitat (Smaal et al. 2009). Substrate (e.g. shells of cockles, oysters) is available throughout the Eastern Scheldt, but at exposed and eroding sites a more fixed substrate needs to be present to allow for an oyster reef to develop. Therefore, the use of gabions filled with oyster shells is required at these sites. Research has shown that dead oyster shells are the preferred substrate for settlement.
Sedimentation - Burial of oysters will lead to mortality and slow development or possible disappearance of the reef. Too high sedimentation rates are therefore limiting. The pilot in the Eastern Scheldt showed that this can be a problem, depending on location of the reefs and the meteorological circumstances (storm events).
Suspended sediment concentration - In the Eastern Scheldt suspended sediment concentrations are very low (on average < 25 mg/l), and therefore is not a limiting factor for oyster growth. However, in other systems too high SSC can clog the gills of oysters and result in mortality.
Sufficient food availability - Because of the high primary production in the Eastern Scheldt, the area is an important shellfish culture area (mussels, oysters) (Smaal et al. 2013). A concern was raised that additional reefs for coastal protection purposes would affect the carrying capacity of the Eastern Scheldt for shellfish. In the case of the present experiments (Case Shellfish Reefs), calculation led to the conclusion that their effect on the carrying capacity in the Eastern Scheldt is marginal. However, when applied on a large scale, the possible influence on the carrying capacity must be considered.
Connectivity - Proximity to other shellfish reefs of the same species, in this case the Pacific Oyster, is important for the supply of larvae. Supply of larvae in the Eastern Scheldt is guaranteed by the presence of natural reefs and cultured oysters.
Disease in the vicinity - Until recently there were no diseases in the area, as far as known from experience of the oyster farmers in the region. However, in 2010 the oyster herpes virus was detected in the Eastern Scheldt. In addition, the predatory neogastropod the Japanese (Ocinebrellus inornatus) and American oyster drill (Urosalpinx cinerea) are found in the Eastern Scheldt.
Due to the experiments already conducted in the Eastern Scheldt a lot of information is available. It appears that location in combination with suitable hydrodynamic conditions is critical to the successful creation of sustainable oyster reefs there. In addition, appropriate substrate (preferably dead oyster shells) needs to be placed to allow settlement of larvae. Experiments have shown gabions are most suitable to keep the shellfish-substrate in place.
- Baudrimont, M., Schäfer, J. et al. (2005). Geochemical survey and metal bioaccumulation of three bivalve species (Crassostrea gigas, Cerastoderma edule and Ruditapes philippinarum) in the Nord Médoc salt marshes (Gironde estuary, France). Science of the Total Environment 337(1-3): 265-280.
- Beck, M. W., Brumbaugh, R. D. et al. (2011). Oyster reefs at risk and recommendations for conservation, restoration, and management. BioScience 61(2): 107-116.
- Borsje, B. W., van Wesenbeeck, B. K. et al. (2011). How ecological engineering can serve in coastal protection. Ecological Engineering 37(2): 113-122.
- Bougrier, S., Geairon, P. et al. (1995). Allometric relationships and effects of temperature on clearance and oxygen consumption rates of Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg). Aquaculture 134(1–2): 143-154.
- Brown, K. M. and Swearingen, D. C. (1998). Effects of seasonality, length of immersion, locality and predation on an intertidal fouling assemblage in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 225(1): 107-121.
- Brumbaugh, R. D. and Coen, L. D. (2009). Contemporary approaches for small-scale oyster reef restoration to address substrate versus recruitment limitation: A review and comments relevant for the olympia oyster, Ostrea lurida carpenter 1864. Journal of Shellfish Research 28(1): 147-161.
- Coen, L. D., Brumbaugh, R. D. et al. (2007). Ecosystem services related to oyster restoration. Marine Ecology Progress Series 341: 303-307.
- De Mesel, I., Ysebaert, T. and Kamermans, P. (2013). Klimaatbestendige dijken, het concept wisselpolders, Institute of Marine Resource Studies (IMARES).
- De Vries, M. B., Bouma, T. J., van Katwijk, M. M., Borsje, B. W., van Wesenbeeck, B. K. (2007) Biobouwers van de kust. Rapport Z4158, WL|Delft Hydraulics, The Netherlands
- Etheridge, S. M. (2010). Paralytic shellfish poisoning: Seafood safety and human health perspectives. Toxicon 56(2): 108-122.
- Eggleston, D. B. (1990). Functional responses of blue crabs Callinectes sapidus Rathbun feeding on juvenile oysters Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin): effects of predator sex and size, and prey size. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 143: 73-90.
- Forrest, B. M., Keeley, N. B. et al. (2009). Bivalve aquaculture in estuaries: Review and synthesis of oyster cultivation effects. Aquaculture 298(1-2): 1-15.
- Grabowski, J. H., Peterson, C. H. et al. (2007). Restoring oyster reefs to recover ecosystem services. Theoretical Ecology Series, Academic Press 4: 281-298.
- Harding, J.M., Mann, R., Southworth, M. & Wesson, J. (2010). Management of the Piankatank River, Virginia, in support of oyster (Crassostrea virginica, Gmelin 1791) fishery repletion. journal of Shellfish Research 29: 1-22.
- Jackson, J. B. C., Kirby, M. X. et al. (2001). Historical Overfishing and the Recent Collapse of Coastal Ecosystems. Science 293(5530): 629-637.
- Lenihan, H. S. (1999). Physical-biological coupling on oyster reefs: How habitat structure influences individual performance. Ecological Monographs 69(3): 251-275.
- Mann, R. and Powell, E. N. (2007). Why oyster restoration goals in the Chesapeake Bay are not and probably cannot be achieved. Journal of Shellfish Research 26(4): 905-917.
- Mann, R., Harding, J.M. & Southworth, M.J. (2009). Reconstructing pre-colonial oyster demographics in the Chesapeake Bay, USA. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 85: 217-222.
- Mariculture, C. o. B. P. f. S. and P. R. N. S. the Effects of Commercial Activities in Drakes Estero, California (2010). Ecosystem Concepts for Sustainable Bivalve Mariculture, The National Academies Press. ISBN 978-0-309-14695-1.
- Molnar, J. L., Gamboa, R. L., et al. (2008). Assessing the global threat of invasive species to marine biodiversity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6(9): 485-492.
- Piazza, B. P., Banks, P. D. et al. (2005). The potential for created oyster shell reefs as a sustainable shoreline protection strategy in Louisiana. Restoration Ecology 13(3): 499-506.
- Powers, S. P., Peterson, C. H. et al. (2009). Success of constructed oyster reefs in no-harvest sanctuaries: Implications for restoration. Marine Ecology Progress Series 389: 159-170.
- Rippey, S. R. (1994). Infectious diseases associated with molluscan shellfish consumption. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 7(4): 419-425.
- Schellekens, T. and Smaal, A. C. (2012). BO Zuidwestelijke Delta: Nutrientendynamiek en verandering van draagkracht. Yerseke, Wageningen IMARES. Rapport / IMARES C070/12) - 25 p.
- Schellekens, T., Wijsman, J. W. M. et al. (2011). Habitat suitability modeling for the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg, 1793), IMARES: 29.
- Schulte, D. M., Burke, R. P. et al. (2009). Unprecedented restoration of a native oyster metapopulation. Science 325(5944): 1124-1128.
- Scyphers, S. B., Powers, S. P. et al. (2011). Oyster reefs as natural breakwaters mitigate shoreline loss and facilitate fisheries. PLoS ONE 6(8).
- Sluis, C. J. and Ysebaert, T. (2012). On combining coastal defence and aquaculture, IMARES.
- Southworth M., Harding J.M., Wesson, J.A. & Mann, R. (2010). Oyster (Crassostrea virginica, Gmelin 1791) Population Dynamics on Public Reefs in the Great Wicomico River, Virginia, USA. Journal of Shellfish Research 29: 271-290.
- Strand, A., Waenerlund, A. et al. (2011). High tolerance of the pacific oyster (crassostrea gigas, thunberg) to low temperatures. Journal of Shellfish Research 30(3): 733-735.
- Troost, K. (2009). Pacific oysters in Dutch estuaries. Causes of Success and Consequences for Native Bivalves. Phd, Groningen.
- Troost, K. (2010). Causes and effects of a highly successful marine invasion: Case-study of the introduced Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas in continental NW European estuaries. Journal of Sea Research 64: 145-165.
- Pacific oyster distribution, image: Molnar, Gamboa et al. 2008.
- Pacific oyster, photo: IMARES
- Established Pacific oyster reef in the Oosterschelde, photo: IMARES
- Installation artificial oyster reef in the Oosterschelde, photo: IMARES
- Abiotic environmental conditions, photo: