Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 4.0
Wiki Markup
{import:NavigationMenu}

h1. 

Group

...

3:

...

Benchmarks

...

from

...

spreadsheets

...

This

...

section

...

uses

...

tests

...

performed

...

by

...

hand

...

or

...

by

...

means

...

of

...

an

...

Excel

...

spreadsheet.

...

3.1

...

Test

...

of

...

all

...

possible

...

trajectories

...

of

...

the

...

Global

...

check

...

Description

This benchmark tests all possible trajectories according to the Global check. Those trajectories are:

  • Case A: step 1 = No → Global check passed
  • Case B: step 1 = Yes, step 2 = No, step 4 = No → Global check passed
  • Case C: step 1 = Yes, step 2 = No, step 4 = Yes, step 5 = No → Global check passed
  • Case D: step 1 = Yes, step 2 = No, step 4 = Yes, step 5 = Yes → Global check failed
  • Case E: step 1 = Yes, step 2 = Yes → Global check failed

For case A, the same input as benchmark 1-1 (see group 1) is used except for the surface line: the length of the foreland is increased to 160 m (instead of 60 m).

For case B, the same input as benchmark 1-1 (see group 1) is used except for xxx: xxx.

For case C, the same input as benchmark 1-1 (see group 1) is used except for xxx: xxx.

For case D, the same input as benchmark 1-1 (see group 1) is used.

For case E, the same input as benchmark 1-1 (see group 1) is used except for xxx: xxx.

Benchmarks results

Hereafter are given the analytical results per case.

...

Case A:

...

Channel depth: H = 15 m
Thickness of the sensitive layer: Hvw = 10 m
Marge = 2 Hvw + 1.5 (H - Hvw) = 27.5 m

Slope of the observation profile: 1:15
Assessment level: Z = -10 m
XSsign = 72.5 m
XSzv = 30 m

D-Flow Slide results

D-FLOW SLIDE results are in accordance with the results by hand as show in the tables below.

...

Results of benchmark 3-1 for case A

...

 

Benchmark

D-FLOW SLIDE

Relative error

Marge

xxx

xxx

xxx

Assessment level

xxx

xxx

xxx

X-coordinate of the observation point Ssign

xxx

xxx

xxx

X-coordinate of the liquefaction point SZV

xxx

xxx

xxx

Step 1: Is liquefaction damaging on basis of geometry?

No

No

(plus)

Result of the Global check

Passed

Passed

(plus)

...

Results of benchmark 3-1 for case B

...

 

Benchmark

D-FLOW SLIDE

Relative error

Marge

xxx

xxx

xxx

Assessment level

xxx

xxx

xxx

X-coordinate of the observation point Ssign

xxx

xxx

xxx

X-coordinate of the liquefaction point SZV

xxx

xxx

xxx

Step 1: Is liquefaction damaging on basis of geometry?

Yes

Yes

(plus)

Step 2: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore?

No

No

(plus)

Step 4: Is liquefaction possible on the basis of the geometry?

No

No

(plus)

Result of the Global check

Passed

Passed

(plus)

...

Results of benchmark 3-1 for case C

...

 

Benchmark

D-FLOW SLIDE

Relative error

Marge

xxx

xxx

xxx

Assessment level

xxx

xxx

xxx

X-coordinate of the observation point Ssign

xxx

xxx

xxx

X-coordinate of the liquefaction point SZV

xxx

xxx

xxx

Step 1: Is liquefaction damaging on basis of geometry?

Yes

Yes

(plus)

Step 2: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore?

No

No

(plus)

Step 4: Is liquefaction possible on the basis of the geometry?

Yes

Yes

(plus)

Step 5: Are there any sensitive to liquefaction layers present?

No

No

(plus)

Result of the Global check

Passed

Passed

(plus)

...

Results of benchmark 3-1 for case D

...

 

Benchmark

D-FLOW SLIDE

Relative error

Marge

xxx

xxx

xxx

Assessment level

xxx

xxx

xxx

X-coordinate of the observation point Ssign

xxx

xxx

xxx

X-coordinate of the liquefaction point SZV

xxx

xxx

xxx

Step 1: Is liquefaction damaging on basis of geometry?

Yes

Yes

(plus)

Step 2: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore?

No

No

(plus)

Step 4: Is liquefaction possible on the basis of the geometry?

Yes

Yes

(plus)

Step 5: Are there any sensitive to liquefaction layers present?

Yes

Yes

(plus)

Result of the Global check

Failed

Failed

(plus)

...

Results of benchmark 3-1 for case E

...

 

Benchmark

D-FLOW SLIDE

Relative error

Marge

xxx

xxx

xxx

Assessment level

xxx

xxx

xxx

X-coordinate of the observation point Ssign

xxx

xxx

xxx

X-coordinate of the liquefaction point SZV

xxx

xxx

xxx

Step 1: Is liquefaction damaging on basis of geometry?

Yes

Yes

(plus)

Step 2: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore?

Yes

Yes

(plus)

Result of the Global check

Failed

Failed

(plus)