...
This benchmark tests all possible trajectories according to the Global check and all possible combinations between the Global and the Detailed checks:
| Case | Step 11a | Step 31c | Step 41d | Step 51e Average slope | Step 61e Breach flow | Step 71e | Global check | Detailed check | Overall result | Warning message |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | No | Pass | Pass | Warning | D50 < 200 μm in the Detailed check, Advanced check needed | |||||
| B | Yes | Yes | Fail | Pass | Fail | Artificial foreland, Advanced check needed | ||||
| C | Yes | No | No | Pass | ||||||
| D | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Fail | Pass | Pass | |||
| E | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Fail | Pass | Pass | ||
| F | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Fail | Fail | Fail | |
| G | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | Pass | Fail | Warning message |
...
For case A, the same input as benchmark 1-1 (see group 1) is used except for the surface line : (the length of the foreland is increased to 160 m ( instead of 60 m) and a "Distance influence zone" of 10 m is used.
For case B, the same input as benchmark 1-1 (see group 1) is used except for the foreland: an artificial instead of a natural foreland is assumed.
...