...
| Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Step 1a: Would flow slide lead to damage on levee? Marge [m] Slope [1:xxx] Assessment level [m + NAP] |
Yes 30.000 15.000 -10.000 |
Yes 30.000 15.000 -10.000 |
OK 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % | ||||
| Step 1c: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? | No | No | OK | ||||
Step 1d: Flow slide possible based on criteria "steepest slope aver 5m" ? Average slope over a height of at least 5 m [1:xxx] |
No 5.000 |
No 5.000 |
OK 0.00 % | ||||
Step 1e: Flow slide possible based on average geometry only? Total inclination of the channel slope [1:xxx] Is breaching possible? |
Yes 5.000 Yes |
Yes 5.000 Yes |
OK 0.00 % OK | ||||
Result of the Global check | Fail | Fail | OK | ||||
| Fictive channel depth Hr [m] | 25.143 | 25.143 | 0.00 % | ||||
| Fictive slope cotan αr | 14 | 14 | 0.00 % | ||||
| Max. allowable retrogression length Lallowable [m] | 60 | 60 | 0.00 % | ||||
| Probability of preventing a liquefaction P(ZV) [/km/year] | 1.44 80 × 10-6 | 1.44 80 × 10-6 | 0.00 % | ||||
| Reliability index β | - | 0 | - | ||||
| P(L > Lallowable) [/year] | 5.00 × 10-1 | 5.00 × 10-1 | 0.23 00 % | ||||
| Probability of flood damage by liquefaction P(falen|ZV) [/year] | 78.18 98 × 10-7 7 | 8.18 98 × 10-7 | 0.18 % | Allowable probability of failure [/year] | 2.50 × 10-6 | 2.50 × 10-6 | 0.00 % |
Result of the Detailed check | Pass | Pass | OK | ||||
| Overall result | Warning | Warning | OK |
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case F:
| Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error |
|---|---|---|---|
Step 1a: Would flow slide lead to damage on levee? Marge [m] Slope [1:xxx] Assessment level [m + NAP] |
Yes 25.352360 15.000 -10.775 |
Yes 25.352360 15.000 -10.775 |
OK 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % |
| Step 1c: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? | No | No | OK |
Step 1d: Flow slide possible based on criteria "steepest slope aver 5m" ? Average slope over a height of at least 5 m [1:xxx] |
No 7.099094 |
No 7.100096 |
OK 0.01 03 % |
Step 1e: Flow slide possible based on average geometry only? Total inclination of the channel slope [1:xxx] Is breaching possible? |
Yes 7.100 Yes |
Yes 7.100 Yes |
OK 0.00 % OK |
Result of the Global check | Fail | Fail | OK |
| Fictive channel depth Hr [m] | 25.874864 | 25.874864 | 0.00 % |
| Fictive slope cotan αr | 6.641646 | 6.641646 | 0.00 % |
| Max. allowable retrogression length Lallowable [m] | 60 | 60 | 0.00 % |
| Probability of preventing a liquefaction P(ZV) [/km/year] | 23.67 33 × 10-72 | 3.67 33 × 10-7 | 0.00 % |
| Reliability index β | - | 0.974976 | - |
| P(L > Lallowable) [/year] | 1.65 × 10-1 | 1.65 × 10-1 | 0.10 00 % |
| Probability of flood damage by liquefaction P(falen|ZV) [/year] | 45.40 48 × 10-8 | 4.40 × 10-8 | 0.00 % |
| Allowable probability of failure [/year] | 2.50 × 10-6 | 2.50 × 10-6 | 0.00 % |
Result of the Detailed check | Pass | Pass | OK |
| Overall result | Warning | Warning | OK |
| 5.48 × 10-8 | 0.00 % |
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case G:
| Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error |
|---|---|---|---|
Step 1a: Would flow slide lead to damage on levee? Marge [m] Slope [1:xxx] Assessment level [m + NAP] |
Yes 27.280 15.000 -10.453 |
Yes 27.280 15.000 -10.453 |
OK 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % |
| Step 1c: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? | No | No | OK |
Step 1d: Flow slide possible based on criteria "steepest slope aver 5m" ? Average slope over a height of at least 5 m [1:xxx] |
No 6.595 |
No 6.596 |
OK 0.02 % |
Step 1e: Flow slide possible based on average geometry only? Total inclination of the channel slope [1:xxx] Is breaching possible? |
No 6.600 No |
No 6.600 No |
OK 0.00 % OK |
Result of the Global check | Pass | Pass | OK |
| Fictive channel depth Hr [m] | 19.308 | 19.308 | 0.00 % |
| Fictive slope cotan αr | 10.500 | 10.500 | 0.00 % |
| Max. allowable retrogression length Lallowable [m] | 60 | 60 | 0.00 % |
| Probability of preventing a liquefaction P(ZV) [/km/year] | 12.84 30 × 10-71 | 2.84 31 × 10-7 | 0.00 43 % |
| Reliability index β | - | 1.285 | - |
| P(L > Lallowable) [/year] | 9.95 × 10-2 | 9.95 × 10-2 | 0.00 % |
| Probability of flood damage by liquefaction P(falen|ZV) [/year] | 12.83 29 × 10-81 | 2.83 29 × 10-8 | 0.00 % |
| Allowable probability of failure [/year] | 2.50 × 10-6 | 2.50 × 10-6 | 0.00 % |
Result of the Detailed check | Pass | Pass | OK |
| Overall result | Pass | Pass | OK |
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case H:
...