...
| Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Step 1a: Would flow slide lead to damage on levee? Marge [m] Slope [1:xxx] Assessment level [m + NAP] |
Yes 27.280 15.000 -10.453 |
Yes 27.280 15.000 -10.453 |
OK 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % | ||||
Step 1c: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? | No | No | OK | ||||
Step 1d: Flow slide possible based on criteria "steepest slope aver 5m" ? Average slope over a height of at least 5 m [1:xxx] |
No 6.596 |
No 6.596 |
OK 0.02 % | ||||
Step 1e: Flow slide possible based on average geometry only? Total inclination of the channel slope [1:xxx] Is breaching possible? |
No 6.600 No |
No 6.600 No |
OK 0.00 % OK | ||||
Result of the Global check | Pass | Pass | OK | ||||
Fictive channel depth Hr [m] | 19.038 | 19.038 | 0.00 % | ||||
Fictive slope cotan αr | 10.500 | 10.500 | 0.00 % | ||||
Max. allowable retrogression length Lallowable [m] | 60 | 60 | 0.00 % | ||||
Probability of preventing a liquefaction P(ZV) [/km/year] | 45.64 80 × 10-44 | 5.64 80 × 10-4 | 0.00 % | ||||
Reliability index β | - | 1.285 | - | ||||
P(L > Lallowable) [/year] | 9.95 × 10-2 | 9.95 × 10-2 | 0.00 % | ||||
Probability of flood damage by liquefaction P(falen|ZV) [/year] | 45.62 77 × 10-54 | 5.62 77 × 10-5 | 0.00 % | Allowable probability of failure [/year] | 2.50 × 10-7 | 2.50 × 10-7 | 0.00 % |
Result of the Detailed check | Fail | Fail | OK | ||||
Overall result | Warning | Warning | OK |
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case I:
| Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Step 1a: Would flow slide lead to damage on levee? Marge [m] Slope [1:xxx] Assessment level [m + NAP] |
Yes 27.280 15.000 -10.453 |
Yes 27.280 15.000 -10.453 |
OK 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % | ||||
Step 1c: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? | No | No | OK | ||||
Step 1d: Flow slide possible based on criteria "steepest slope aver 5m" ? Average slope over a height of at least 5 m [1:xxx] |
No 6.595 |
No 6.596 |
OK 0.01 % | ||||
Step 1e: Flow slide possible based on average geometry only? Total inclination of the channel slope [1:xxx] Is breaching possible? |
No 6.600 No |
No 6.600 No |
OK 0.00 % OK | ||||
Result of the Global check | Pass | Pass | OK | ||||
Result of the Detailed check | Not available | Not available | OK | Overall result | Pass | Pass | OK |
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case J:
| Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Step 1a: Would flow slide lead to damage on levee? Marge [m] Slope [1:xxx] Assessment level [m + NAP] |
Yes 30.000 15.000 -10.000 |
Yes 30.000 15.000 -10.000 |
OK 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % | ||||
Step 1c: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? | Yes | Yes | OK | ||||
Step 1d: Flow slide possible based on criteria "steepest slope aver 5m" ? Average slope over a height of at least 5 m [1:xxx] |
No 6 |
No 6 |
OK 0.00 % | ||||
Step 1e: Flow slide possible based on average geometry only? Total inclination of the channel slope [1:xxx] Is breaching possible? |
Yes 6 Yes |
Yes 6 Yes |
OK 0.00 % OK | ||||
Result of the Global check | Fail | Fail | OK | ||||
Result of the Detailed check | Not available | Not available | OK | Overall result | Fail | Fail | OK |