Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Detailed check: (see table below for intermediary results) Probability of flood damage by liquefaction  < > Allowable probability of failure  => Detailed check passesfails.

Overall check: the Overall result gives a warning because the criteria on "steepest slope over 5 m" is met, an Advanced check is therefore needed.

...

 

Benchmark

D-FLOW SLIDE

Relative error

Step 1a:

Would flow slide lead to damage on levee?

Marge [m]

Slope [1:xxx]

Assessment level [m + NAP]

 

Yes

28.016

15.000

-10.331

 

Yes

28.016

15.000

-10.331

 

OK

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Step 1c: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore?NoNoOK

Step 1d:

Flow slide possible based on criteria "steepest slope aver 5m" ?

Average slope over a height of at least 5 m [1:xxx]

 

Yes

3.901

 

Yes

3.901

 

OK

0.00 %

Step 1e:

Flow slide possible based on average geometry only?

Total inclination of the channel slope [1:xxx]

Is breaching possible?

 

Yes

7.395

Yes

 

Yes

7.395

Yes

 

OK

0.00 %

OK

Result of the Global check

Fail

Fail

OK

Fictive channel depth Hr [m]23.79123.7910.00 %
Fictive slope cotan αr8.4138.4130.00 % 
Max. allowable retrogression length Lallowable [m]60600.00 %
Probability of preventing a liquefaction P(ZV) [/year] 7.04 × 10-87.04 × 10-80.00 %
Reliability index β--139.334999 -
P(L > Lallowable) [/year] 9.09 × 10-1009.09 × 10-10.00 % 
Probability of flood damage by liquefaction P(falen|ZV) [/year]6.40 × 10-8006.40 × 10-80.00 %
 
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case D: 

...