...
| Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error |
---|---|---|---|
Step 1a: Would flow slide lead to damage on levee? Marge [m] Slope [1:xxx] Assessment level [m + NAP] |
Yes 36.000 15.000 -9.000 |
Yes 36.000 15.000 -9.000 |
OK 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % |
Step 1c: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? | No | No | OK |
Step 1d: Flow slide possible based on criteria "steepest slope aver 5m" ? Average slope over a height of at least 5 m [1:xxx] |
No 5.000 |
No 5.000 |
OK 0.00 % |
Step 1e: Flow slide possible based on average geometry only? Total inclination of the channel slope [1:xxx] Is breaching possible? |
Yes 5.000 Yes |
Yes 5.000 Yes |
OK 0.00 % OK |
Result of the Global check | Fail | Fail | OK |
Fictive channel depth Hr [m] | 25.143 | 25.143 | 0.00 % |
Fictive slope cotan αr | 14 | 14 | 0.00 % |
Max. allowable retrogression length Lallowable [m] | 60 | 60 | 0.00 % |
Probability of preventing a liquefaction P(ZV) [/year] | 1.80 × 10-6 | 1.80 × 10-6 | 0.00 % |
Reliability index β | -0 | 1.234 | - |
P(L > Lallowable) [/year] | 51.00 08 × 10-15 | 1.00 08 × 10-1 | 0.00 % |
Probability of flood damage by liquefaction P(falen|ZV) [/year] | 81.98 95 × 10-7 8 | 1.98 95 × 10-7 | 0.00 % |
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case F:
...