Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

2.3 OpenMI 2.0 architecture

Quality versus Quantity

_We tried to remind ourselves about the outcome of previous discussions about quality, quantity, and categorized data.
The figure below shows the Interfaces we wanted to be implemented._

Rob Knapen, will implement this in these interfaces in the Java implementation in the svn trunk. Notice that the trunk on sourceforge now represents the developments towards version 2

2.4 Development and release roadmap

...

Review and update the OATC procedures (GOTO OATC procedures)

Jan Gregersen will update the proceedures

5. OpenMI WIKI

A page called HowTO get the most recent source code was added to the getting started page

Peter Schade will create a page describing issues relevant for running OpenMI under Linux

6. www.OpenMI.org

No changes

7. Miscellaneous issues

7.1 OpenMI and Linux (Peter Schade)

    • short overview, why BAW is interested in linux
    • OpenMI (C#) standard has to be ported, which OpenMI version is suitable for Mono?
    • the C# wrappers have to be ported
    • the Fortran engines have to be ported, which compiler, ifort or Compaq Digital?
    • accessing the Fortran dll from C#

Peter Schade gave a presentation of his experiences so far with running OpenMI under Linux

See OpenMIGoesLinux_200804.pdf presentation from BAW.

...

We need to decide how to handle the version control on source forge. Should version 2 be developed as the trunk and version 1.4.1 a branch? Whatever we decide should be described in a OATC procedure.

_We reorganized the svn repository. The development towards version 1.4.1 will now take place in the branch called OpenMI-1.4.1-dev and the developments towards version 2.0 will take place in the trunk. Tags and branches were renamed so the names will indicate the version number.
Se tags and branches after the update below._

8. Tasks and unresolved issues

...