Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Wiki Markup
{import:NavigationMenu}

h1.  Welcome Deliverables

|| WP || Name || Del. || Name || Remarks ||
| 1 | Co-ordination | 1.1 | [Semi-annual progress reports to be compiled from the information obtained from the project partners as input in the General co-ordination Board (GB)|^D1.1.zip] | \- |
| | | 1.2 | [Proceedings of the International Workshop (at ConSoil 2003)|^D1.2.zip] | \- |
| | | 1.3 | Final report of Integrated Management System (IMS) | Missing |
| 2 | Industrial harbour areas: Case Rotterdam, the Netherlands | 2.1 | [GIS mapped megasite description: current and planned use, potential and actual risks |^D2.1.zip] | |
| | | 2.2 | [Boundary conditions for sustainable development: stakeholders interest, funding options and legislative framework (water quality targets set by water framework directive)|^D2.2.zip] | |
| | | 2.3 | [Management instruments and effects: risk-function relations and risk reduction measures |^D2.2.zip] | |
| | | 2.4 | [Description of Management Options |^D2.3D2.4.zip] | |
| | | 2.5 | [Option driven rehabilitation scenarios, technical feasibility tests and technical designs |^D2.5D2.6.zip] | |
| | | 2.6 | [Cost-efficient management scenarios and selection of final IMS |^D2.5D2.6.zip] | |
| | | 2.7 | [Embedding principles and organizational models for IMS implementation |^D2.7.zip] | |
| 3 | Chloro-organic chemical industrial area: Case Bitterfeld, Germany | 3.1 | [GIS mapped megasite description: current and planned use, potential and actual risks |^D3.1.zip] | |
| | | 3.2 | [Boundary conditions for sustainable development: stakeholders interest, funding options and legislative framework (water quality targets set by water framework directive) |^D3.2.zip] | |
| | | 3.3 | [Management instruments and effects: risk-function relations and risk reduction measures |^D3.3.zip] | |
| | | 3.4 | [Description of Management Options |^D3.4.zip] | |
| | | 3.5 | [Option driven rehabilitation scenarios, technical feasibility tests and technical designs |^D3.5.zip] | |
| | | 3.6 | [Cost-efficient management scenarios and selection of final IMS |^D3.6.zip] | |
| | | 3.7 | [Embedding principles and organizational models for IMS implementation |^D3.7.zip] | |
| 4 | Metal mining & processing area Case Tarnowskie Góry, Poland | 4.1 | [GIS mapped megasite description: current and planned use, potential and actual risks |^D3.7.zip] | |
| | | 4.2 | [Boundary conditions for sustainable development: stakeholders interest, funding options and legislative framework (water quality targets set by water framework directive) |^D4.2.zip] | |
| | | 4.3 | [Management instruments and effects: risk-function relations and risk reduction measures |^D4.3.zip] | |
| | | 4.4 | [Description of Management Options |^D4.4.zip] | |
| | | 4.5 | [Option driven rehabilitation scenarios, technical feasibility tests and technical designs |^D4.5.zip] | |
| | | 4.6 | [Cost-efficient management scenarios and selection of final IMS |^D4.6.zip] | |
| | | 4.7 | [Embedding principles and organizational models for IMS implementation |^D4.7.zip] | |
| 5 | Megasite risk assessment | 5.1 | [Procedure for risk assessment and evaluating the proportionality of hazard prevention measures in mega-projects |^D5.1.zip] | |
| | | 5.2 | [Assessment system for hazard appraisal and measure ranking in Megaprojects with regard to subsequent utilization (function-orientated risk assessment) |^D5.2.zip] | |
| | | 5.3 | [Guideline for monitoring and predicting the temporal and spatial behaviour of groundwater contamination for cost-effective procedures based on the risk-related management of sites |^D5.2.zip] | |
| | | 5.4 | [Risk assessment of the three Welcome Megasites |^D5.3.zip] | |
| | | 5.5 | [Evaluation study on the Welcome Mega sites risk assessments comparing national requirements versus the new harmonized procedure |^D5.5.zip] | |
| 6 | Multi source & mixed contaminants (NA) | 6.1 | [Set of criteria for the suitability assessment of MNA as a site remediation measure as input for the IMS |^D5.5.zip] | |
| | | 6.2 | [Technical guideline for the implementation of MNA for the management of multiple contaminated Megasites |^D6.1.zip] | |
| | | 6.3 | [Report on the applicability of existing protocols/guidelines for EU Megasites |^D6.3.zip] | |
| | | 6.4 | [Protocol/technical guideline for the implementation on MNA (Demona) |^D6.4.zip] | |
| 7 | Groundwater / surface water interface (NA) | 7.1 | [Special instruments and procedures for collecting field data at the groundwater - surface water interface |^D6.4.zip] | |
| | | 7.2 | [A reactive transport model for pollutants in the groundwater -- surface water interface |^D7.2.zip] | |
| | | 7.3 | [A model describing the macro(bio)chemistry of the sediment for conceptual model building, interpretation of field data and quantification and prediction of NA-interface performance |^D7.3.zip] | |
| | | 7.4 | [Systematics for evaluation of the relative impact of groundwater contamination on surface water quality, using NA-interface knowledge and with respect to other sources of contaminant in-flux to water systems |^D7.4.zip] | |
| | | 7.5 | [NA-interface assessment system in contaminated megasite water quality management, in compliance with national/EU water directive standards | |^D7.4.zip] | |
| 8 | Heavy metals (immobilization) | 8.1 | [A simple method of risks identification (actual and potential) due to the presence of heavy metals |^D8.1.zip] | |
| | | 8.2 | [Screening and selection method for the evaluation of reduction in bioavailability and the selection of immobilizing agents |^D8.2.zip] | |
| | | 8.3 | [Analysis of sample rocks the Tarnowskie Góry site from various water-saturated layers, assessment of the immobilization of heavy metals in chemical and biological processes |^D8.3.zip] | |
| | | 8.4 | [Investigation of kinetics of surface water self-cleaning |^D8.4.zip] | |
| 9 | Multi Sediments (immobilization) | 9.1 | [Description of characteristics of three Megasites |^D9.1.zip] | |
| | | 9.2 | [A method for rapid determination of the fraction of HOC that will desorb to the surface water |^D9.2.zip] | |
| | | 9.3 | [A tool for describing and predicting the transport of contaminated sediment particulates |^D9.3.zip] | |
| | | 9.4 | [A simulation model for selection and evaluation of measures to reduce or prevent contaminant transport to the water system |^D9.3.zip] | |
| | | 9.5 | [A concept for an engineered emission control technology |^D9.5.zip] | |
| 10 | Cost efficiency assessment (NA) | 10.1 | Pre-selection tool | See D10.3 |
| | | 10.2 | Cost-estimation tool, CARO -- Cost Analysis of Remediation Options Tool Description | See D10.3 |
| | | 10.3 | [Comparative analysis of cost-efficiency |^D10.zip] | |
| 11 | Construction of IMS | 11.1 | [Procedure for GIS based description of Structure Elements of the Megasite and water quality |^D11.1.zip] | |
| | | 11.2 | [Procedure for GIS maps of current and planned function |^D11.2.zip] | |
| | | 11.3 | [Procedure for GIS maps with potential and actual risk profiles for current and planned uses |^details6258.html] | |
| | | 11.4 | Procedure for description of stakeholder's interest and commitment towards current and future use | See IMS \-> organizing stakeholders |
| | | 11.5 | [Procedure for description of public interest and commitment towards current and future use |^D11.5.zip] | |
| | | 11.6 | [Procedure for description of the legislative framework |^D11.6.zip] | |
| | | 11.7 | Procedure for assessing risk-function relations: actual and potential risk in space and time, and effects on asset value | See IMS \-> risk assessment |
| | | 11.8 | Procedure for the description of applicable risk reduction measures | See IMS \-> Risk Management scenarios |
| | | 11.9 | [Procedure for listing and describing of management options |^D11.9.zip] | |
| | | 11.10 | [Procedure for listing research needs and site investigation requirements investigation requirements |^D11.9.zip] | |
| | | 11.11 | Procedure for making a cost efficient IMS for managing megasite water quality | See IMS \-> Potential and Preferred scenarios |
| | | 11.12 | Procedure for embedding principles and organizational models for IMS implementation and use for (stakeholders, public, authorities) | See IMS \-> Implementation |
| | | 11.13 | A guideline for an IMS approach for prevention and rehabilitation of pollution of water bodies at Mega sites | Methodology, see D 11.14 |
| | | 11.14 | [Up to date ICT software based product, available on CD-ROM and through internet |http://http://publicwiki.deltares.nl/display/IMSW/The+Welcome+Project] | |
| 12 | Input & evaluations by international team of end users (INTEND) | 12.1 | [Series of semi-annual evaluation reports |^D12.1.zip] | |
| | | 12.2 | [Evaluation report of the draft version of IMS and advise on research needs |^D12.2.zip] | |
| | | 12.3 | [IMS evaluation report |^D12.3.zip] | |
| 13 | Knowledge transfer & dissemination | 13.1 | [A WELCOME Internet Website |http://publicwiki.deltares.nl/display/IMSW/The+Welcome+Project] | |
| | | 13.2 | Spreading of WELCOME results through the CLARINET and NICOLE networks | During project |
| | | 13.3 | Special WELCOME session at ConSoil 2003 | Done. see D1.2 |
| | | 13.4 | Publications in national/international magazines/journals | During project |
| | | 13.5 | Presentations at national/international conferences/seminars | Continuously during project |
| | | 13.6 | End User Training Course | During project |
| | | 13.7 | Assistance to a native language course for IMS management in EU accession | During project |