Versions Compared


  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.


Adrian Harper, Innovyze Ltd (
Stef Hummel, Deltares (
Jesper Grooss, DHI (, DHI (
Rob Knapen, Alterra, Wageningen UR (
Peter Schade, Bundesanstalt fuer Wasserbau (peter.schade(at)



E-mail from the dissimination committee (Johan/Michiel)

up-to-date list of OATC members


  • let the component write its 'exchange item xml'
  • create the composition in the Pipistrelle GUI
  • write a composition XML
  • run that composition in a lean and mean jave run time environment

1.4 Video on OpenDA website?

Yep, do so.

Status OGC

See note above ("Specification document replaced by OGC format version").

Status OpenMI 2.0

No the issue is how to specify and implement the mandatory conformance tests.

  • Just state for every interface that its methods are implemented correctly?
  • Just say that the component should be loaded in Pipistrelle?
    After some discussion we decided that we will use the same approach as done for netcdf: assume that there is a testing tool implemented, en specify the things to be tested (see the first download on

Johan has asked Standa for the status on the OpenMI 2.0 implementation. Standa will forward the question to Adrian, and Adrian will answer it.
There also is a need for an overview of OpenMI 2.0 compliant components. DHI has a few, but no formal xml etc. yet. Stef will ask the OAEC to find someone to put more effort in gathering compliant components. As a first step Stef will ask the OAEC for a specific email (
There is a EU proposal (CEnTIEM 3) that will put more attention to OpenMI and existing component.
Jan once implemented a tool that generates 1.4. compliancy info XML after loading the component. We should try to find the source of that tool (Jesper will have a look).

Next meetings

Thursday Feb 2nd, 13:30 CET - 14:30 CET