Group 3: Benchmarks from spreadsheets
This section uses tests performed by hand or by means of an Excel spreadsheet.
3.1 Test of all possible trajectories of the Global check
Description
This benchmark tests all possible trajectories according to the Global check. Those trajectories are:
...
For case E, the same input as benchmark 1-1 (see group 1) is used except for xxx: xxx.
Benchmarks results
Hereafter are given the analytical results per case.
Case A:
Channel depth: H = 15 m
Thickness of the sensitive layer: Hvw = 10 m
Marge = 2 Hvw + 1.5 (H - Hvw) = 27.5 m
Slope of the observation profile: 1:15
Assessment level: Z = -10 m
XSsign = 72.5 m
XSzv = 30 m
D-Flow Slide results
D-FLOW SLIDE results are in accordance with the results by hand as show in the tables below.
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case A
| Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error |
|---|---|---|---|
Marge | xxx | xxx | xxx |
Assessment level | xxx | xxx | xxx |
X-coordinate of the observation point Ssign | xxx | xxx | xxx |
X-coordinate of the liquefaction point SZV | xxx | xxx | xxx |
Step 1: Is liquefaction damaging on basis of geometry? | No | No |
|
Result of the Global check | Passed | Passed |
|
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case B
| Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error |
|---|---|---|---|
Marge | xxx | xxx | xxx |
Assessment level | xxx | xxx | xxx |
X-coordinate of the observation point Ssign | xxx | xxx | xxx |
X-coordinate of the liquefaction point SZV | xxx | xxx | xxx |
Step 1: Is liquefaction damaging on basis of geometry? | Yes | Yes |
|
Step 2: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? | No | No |
|
Step 4: Is liquefaction possible on the basis of the geometry? | No | No |
|
Result of the Global check | Passed | Passed |
|
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case C
| Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error |
|---|---|---|---|
Marge | xxx | xxx | xxx |
Assessment level | xxx | xxx | xxx |
X-coordinate of the observation point Ssign | xxx | xxx | xxx |
X-coordinate of the liquefaction point SZV | xxx | xxx | xxx |
Step 1: Is liquefaction damaging on basis of geometry? | Yes | Yes |
|
Step 2: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? | No | No |
|
Step 4: Is liquefaction possible on the basis of the geometry? | Yes | Yes |
|
Step 5: Are there any sensitive to liquefaction layers present? | No | No |
|
Result of the Global check | Passed | Passed |
|
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case D
| Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error |
|---|---|---|---|
Marge | xxx | xxx | xxx |
Assessment level | xxx | xxx | xxx |
X-coordinate of the observation point Ssign | xxx | xxx | xxx |
X-coordinate of the liquefaction point SZV | xxx | xxx | xxx |
Step 1: Is liquefaction damaging on basis of geometry? | Yes | Yes |
|
Step 2: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? | No | No |
|
Step 4: Is liquefaction possible on the basis of the geometry? | Yes | Yes |
|
Step 5: Are there any sensitive to liquefaction layers present? | Yes | Yes |
|
Result of the Global check | Failed | Failed |
|
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case E
| Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error |
|---|---|---|---|
Marge | xxx | xxx | xxx |
Assessment level | xxx | xxx | xxx |
X-coordinate of the observation point Ssign | xxx | xxx | xxx |
X-coordinate of the liquefaction point SZV | xxx | xxx | xxx |
Step 1: Is liquefaction damaging on basis of geometry? | Yes | Yes |
|
Step 2: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? | Yes | Yes |
|
Result of the Global check | Failed | Failed |
|