...
Group | Input file (*.fsx) | Title | Global (VTV) | Detailed (TR) | Advanced liquefaction(SLIQ2D) | Advanced breaching | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | bm1-1 | Study Case described in Technisch Rapport Voorland Zettingsvloeiing |
|
| |||
2
| bm2-1 | Spui dike - hmp 63.9 (location Nieuw Beijerland) |
|
|
|
| |
bm2-2 | Spui dike - hmp 65.0 (between locations Oud Beijerland and Nieuw Beijerland) |
|
|
|
| ||
bm2-3 | Spui dike - hmp 67.8 (location Oud Beijerland) |
|
|
|
| ||
3
| bm3-1a | Global check with traject: step 1 = No (Passed) | |
|
| ||
bm3-1b | Global check with traject: step 1 = Yes, step 3 = Yes (Failed) | ||||||
| bm3-1c | Global check with traject: step 1 = Yes, step 3 = No, step 4 = No (Passed) |
|
|
| ||
| bm3-1d | Global check with traject: step 1 = Yes, step 2 = No, step 4 = Yes, step 5 = No (Passed) |
|
|
|
| |
bm3-1e | Global check with traject: step 1 = Yes, step 2 = No, step 4 = Yes, step 5 = Yes (Failed) |
|
|
|
| ||
bm3-1f | Global check with traject: step 1 = Yes, step 2 = Yes (Failed) |
|
|
| |||
4 | bm4-1 | Test on the level indicator |
|
|
|
| |
5
| Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case LGZM1 |
|
|
| |||
| Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case LGZM2 |
|
|
|
| ||
Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case LGZM3 |
|
|
| ||||
| Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case LGZM4 |
|
|
| |||
| Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case SIMPLETA |
|
|
| |||
| Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case LG1D5N5H |
|
|
|
| ||
Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case HBPZBUI3 |
|
|
|
| |||
Comparison with SLIQ2D-Windows - 2 layers partially saturated |
|
|
|
| |||
bm5-3 | Comparison with DZettingsVloeiing - Study Case described in Technisch Rapport Voorland Zettingsvloeiing |
|
|
| |||
| bm5-4 | Comparison with HMBreach - 1 layer |
|
|
| | |
| bm5-5 | Comparison with HMBreach - 2 layers |
|
|
| |
a The detailed check with D-FLOW SLIDE not succeeds whereas it should succeed acc. to the benchmark.