...
Group | Input file (*.fsx) | Title | Global (VTV) | Detailed (TR) | Advanced liquefaction(SLIQ2D) | Advanced breaching | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | bm1-1 | Study Case described in Technisch Rapport Voorland Zettingsvloeiing |
|
|
|
| |||||
| bm1-2a | Determination of the steepest possible breaching profile (step 7 of the Global check) - Case A |  | |||||||||
| bm1-2b | Determination of the steepest possible breaching profile (step 7 of the Global check) - Case B | | |||||||||
| bm1-2c | Determination of the steepest possible breaching profile (step 7 of the Global check) - Case C | | |||||||||
| bm1-2d | Determination of the steepest possible breaching profile (step 7 of the Global check) - Case D | | |||||||||
| bm1-2e | Determination of the steepest possible breaching profile (step 7 of the Global check) - Case E | | |||||||||
| bm1-2f | Determination of the steepest possible breaching profile (step 7 of the Global check) - Case F | | |||||||||
| bm1-2g | Determination of the steepest possible breaching profile (step 7 of the Global check) - Case G | | |||||||||
| bm1-2h | Determination of the steepest possible breaching profile (step 7 of the Global check) - Case H | | |||||||||
| bm1-2i | Determination of the steepest possible breaching profile (step 7 of the Global check) - Case I | | |||||||||
2
| bm2-1 | Spui dike - hmp 63.9 (location Nieuw Beijerland) |
|
|
|
| |||||
bm2-2 | Spui dike - hmp 65.0 (between locations Oud Beijerland and Nieuw Beijerland) |
|
|
|
| ||||||
bm2-3 | Spui dike - hmp 67.8 (location Oud Beijerland) |
|
|
|
| ||||||
3
| bm3-1a | Global check with traject: step 1 = No (Passed) |
| |
|
| |||||
| bm3-1b | Global check with traject: step 1 = Yes, step 3 = Yes (Failed) | | |||||||||
bm3-1c | Global check with traject: step 1 = Yes, step 3 = No, step 4 = No (Passed) |
|
|
|
| ||||||
bm3-1d | Global check with traject: step 1 = Yes, step 2 = No, step 4 = Yes, step 5 = No (Passed) |
|
|
|
| ||||||
bm3-1e | Global check with traject: step 1 = Yes, step 2 = No, step 4 = Yes, step 5 = Yes (Failed) |
|
|
|
| ||||||
bm3-1f | Global check with traject: step 1 = Yes, step 2 = Yes (Failed) |
|
|
|
| ||||||
4 | bm4-1 | Test on the level indicator |
|
|
|
| |||||
5
| bm5-1a | Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case LGZM1 |
|
|
|
| |||||
bm5-1b | Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case LGZM2 |
|
|
|
| ||||||
bm5-1c | Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case LGZM3 |
|
|
|
| ||||||
bm5-1d | Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case LGZM4 |
|
|
|
| ||||||
bm5-1e | Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case SIMPLETA |
|
|
|
| ||||||
bm5-1f | Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case LG1D5N5H |
|
|
|
| ||||||
bm5-1g | Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case HBPZBUI3 |
|
|
|
| ||||||
bm5-2 | Comparison with SLIQ2D-Windows - 2 layers partially saturated |
|
|
|
| ||||||
bm5-3 | Comparison with DZettingsVloeiing - Study Case described in Technisch Rapport Voorland Zettingsvloeiing |
|
|
|
| ||||||
bm5-4 | Comparison with HMBreach - 1 layer |
|
|
| | bm5-5 | Comparison with HMBreach - 2 layers |
|
|
| |
a The detailed check with D-FLOW SLIDE not succeeds whereas it should succeed acc. to the benchmark.