...
| Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error |
---|---|---|---|
Marge | 35 | 35 | 0.00 % |
Slope [1:xxx] | 15 | 15 | 0.00 00 % |
Assessment level | -10 | -10 | 0.00 % |
Step 1: Would flow slide lead to damage on levee? | No | No | OK |
Result of the Global check | Pass | Pass | OK |
Fictive channel depth Hr [m] | 19.087 | 19.087 | 0.00 % |
Fictive slope cotan αr | 23.000 | 23.000 | 0.00 % |
Probability of preventing a liquefaction P(ZV) [/km/year] | 9.14 × 10-7 | 9.14 × 10-7 | 0.00 % |
Reliability index β | 3.749 | 3.748 | 0.03 % |
P(L > Lallowable) | 8.86 × 10-5 | 8.90 × 10-5 | 0.45 % |
Probability of flood damage by liquefaction P(falen|ZV) [/year] | 8.10 × 10-11 | 8.13 × 10-11 | 0.37 % |
Allowable probability of failure [/year] | 2.50 × 10-6 | 2.50 × 10-6 | 0.00 % |
Result of the Detailed check | Pass | Pass | OK |
Overall result | Pass | Pass | OK |
Results of benchmark 1-1 for the Detailed Check
| Unit | Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fictive channel depth (Hr) | [m] | 21.571 | 21.571 | 0.00 % | |||||
Fictive slope (cotan αr) | [-] | 10.500 | 10.500 | 0.00 % | |||||
Probability of liquefaction | [-] | Not checked | |||||||
β | [-] | 3.749 | 3.749 | 0.00 % | |||||
P(L > Lallowable) | [-] | Not checked | |||||||
Probability of failure | [-] | Not checked | |||||||
Allowable probability of failure | [-] | 2.50 × 1E-06 | 2.50 × 1E-06 | 0.00 % | |||||
Result of Detailed Check |
| Not checked |
...
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case B
...