...
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case C
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case B
| Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error |
|---|---|---|---|
Marge | 35 | 35 | 0.00 |
| Slope [1:xxx] | 15 | 15 | 0.00 |
Assessment level | -10 | -10 | 0.00 |
Step 1: Is liquefaction damaging on basis of geometry? | Yes | Yes | OK |
Step 3: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? | Yes | Yes | OK |
Result of the Global check | Fail | Fail | OK |
| Fictive channel depth Hr [m] | 21.571 | 21.571 | 0.00 % |
| Fictive slope cotan αr | 10.5 | 10.5 | 0.00 % |
| Probability of preventing a liquefaction P(ZV) [/km/year] | 1.24 × 10-6 | 1.24 × 10-6 | 0.00 % |
| Reliability index β | 3.749 | 3.749 | 0.00 % |
| P(L > Lallowable) | 8.86 × 10-5 | 8.88 × 10-5 | 0.23 % |
| Probability of flood damage by liquefaction P(falen|ZV) [/year] | 1.10 × 10-10 | 1.10 × 10-10 | 0.00 % |
| Allowable probability of failure [/year] | 2.50 × 10-6 | 2.50 × 10-6 | 0.00 % |
Result of the Detailed check | Pass | Pass | OK |
| Overall result | Pass | Fail | not OK |
| Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error |
|---|---|---|---|
Marge | 35 | 35 | 0.00 |
| Slope [1:xxx] | 15 | 15 | 0.00 |
Assessment level | -10 | -10 | 0.00 |
Step 1: Is liquefaction damaging on basis of geometry? | Yes | Yes | OK |
Step 2: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? | No | No |
|
Step 4: Is liquefaction possible on the basis of the geometry? | Yes | Yes |
|
Step 5: Are there any sensitive to liquefaction layers present? | No | No |
|
Result of the Global check | Passed | Passed |
|
...