Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Detailed check: see table below for intermediary results: Probability of flood damage by liquefaction  < Allowable probability of failure  => Detailed check passes.

Overall check: as Detailed check passes, the Overall check passes. 

 

Case F:

Global check - Step 1: Same results as benchmark 1-1 (flow slide would lead to damage on levee) => Go to step 3.

Global check - Step 3: The foreland is natural => Go to step 4.

Global check - Step 4: The slope channel is 1:6 so softer than 1:7 => Flow slide is possible based on geometry => Go to step 5.

Global check - Step 5: The state parameter is -0.06 so less than -0.05 => Liquefaction is not possible based on the state parameter =>  Go to step 6.

Global check - Step 6: The average diameters over a thickness of 5m are D50 = 250 μm and D15 = 150 μm. So no layers are present with D50 < 200 μm and D15 < 100 μm => Go to step 7.

Global check - Step 7: The slope channel is 1:2, so the slope is steeper than the critical (local) slope from the CUR table => Global check fails and Detailed check needed.

Detailed check: see table below for intermediary results: Probability of flood damage by liquefaction  > Allowable probability of failure  => Detailed check fails.

Overall check: Global and Detailed checks fail, so the , the Overall check fails whatever the Detailed check result

D-Flow Slide results

D-FLOW SLIDE results are in accordance with the results by hand as show in the tables below.

...