...
| Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Marge | 30.000 | 30.000 | 0.00 % | ||||
Step 1a: Would flow slide lead to damage on levee? Marge [m] Slope [1:xxx] | 15Assessment level [m + NAP] |
No 30.000 15.000 | 0.00 % | Assessment level | -10.000 |
No 30.000 15-10.000 -10.000 |
OK 0.00 % |
Step 1a: Would flow slide lead to damage on levee? | No | No | OK | ||||
00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % | |||||||
| Step 1c: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? | No | No | OK | ||||
Step 1d: Flow slide possible based on criteria "steepest slope aver 5m" ? Average slope over a height of at least 5 m [1:xxx] |
No 1:6 |
No 1:6 |
OK 0.00 % | ||||
Step 1e: Flow slide possible based on average geometry only? Total inclination of the channel slopeslope [1:xxx] Is breaching possible? |
Yes 1:6 Yes |
Yes 1:6 Yes |
OK 0.00 % OK | ||||
Result of the Global check | Pass | Pass | OK | ||||
| Fictive channel depth Hr [m] | 19.087 | 19.087 | 0.00 % | ||||
| Fictive slope cotan αr [-] | 23.000 | 23.000 | 0.00 % | ||||
| Max. allowable retrogression length Lallowable [m] | 150.000 | 150.000 | 0.00% | ||||
| Probability of occurence P(ZV) [/km/year] | 2.92 × 10-7 | 2.92 × 10-7 | 0.00 % | ||||
| Reliability index critical length β | - | 39.999 | - | ||||
| Probability P(L > Lallowable) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 % | ||||
| Probability of flood damage by liquefaction P(falen|ZV) [/year] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 % | ||||
| Allowable probability of failure [/year] | 2.50 × 10-6 | 2.50 × 10-6 | 0.00 % | ||||
Result of the Detailed check | Pass | Pass | OK | ||||
| Overall result | Warning | Warning | OK |
...
| Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Step 1a: Would flow slide lead to damage on levee? Marge [m] | Marge | 35.000 | 35.000 | 0.00 % Slope [1:xxx] | 15Assessment level [m + NAP] |
Yes 30.000 15.000 | 0.00 % | Assessment level | -10.000 |
Yes 30.000 15-10.000 -10.000 | 0.00 % |
Step 1: Is liquefaction damaging on basis of geometry? | Yes | Yes | OK | ||||||||
OK 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % | |||||||||||
| Step 1c: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? | Yes | Yes | OK | ||||||||
Step 1d: Flow slide possible based on criteria "steepest slope aver 5m" ? Average slope over a height of at least 5 m [1:xxx] |
No 6 |
No 6 |
OK 0.00 % | ||||||||
Step 1e: Flow slide possible based on average geometry only? Total inclination of the channel slope [1:xxx] Is breaching possible? |
Yes 6 Yes |
Yes 6 Yes |
OK 0.00 % | Step 3: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? | Yes | Yes OK | |||||
Result of the Global check | Fail | Fail | OK | ||||||||
| Fictive channel depth Hr [m] | 21.571 | 21.571 | 0.00 % | ||||||||
| Fictive slope cotan αr | 10.5 | 10.5 | 0.00 % | ||||||||
| Max. allowable retrogression length Lallowable [m] | 60 | 60 | 0.00 % | ||||||||
| Probability of preventing a liquefaction P(ZV) [/km/year] | 13.24 × 95 × 10-671 | 3.24 95 × 10-67 | 0.00 % | ||||||||
| Reliability index β | - | 1.712253127713712 | - | ||||||||
| P(L > Lallowable) | 4.34 × 10-2 | 4.34 × 10-2 | 0.23 % | ||||||||
| Probability of flood damage by liquefaction P(falen|ZV) [/year] | 51.38 × 72× 10-85 | 1.38 72 × 10-8 | 0.00 % | ||||||||
| Allowable probability of failure [/year] | 2.50 × 10-6 | 2.50 × 10-6 | 0.00 % | ||||||||
Result of the Detailed check | Pass | Pass | OK | ||||||||
| Overall result | Fail | Fail | OK |
...