Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Global check - Step 1e:

D50 = 180 μm < 250  200  μm => Breaching is possible.

...

 

Benchmark

D-FLOW SLIDE

Relative error

Step 1a:

Would flow slide lead to damage on levee?

Marge [m]

Slope [1:xxx]

Assessment level [m + NAP]

 

Yes

30.000

15.000

-10.000

 

Yes

30.000

15.000

-10.000

 

OK

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Step 1c: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore?NoNoOK

Step 1d:

Flow slide possible based on criteria "steepest slope aver 5m" ?

Average slope over a height of at least 5 m [1:xxx]

 

YesNo

25.000

 

YesNo

25.000

 

OK

0.00 %

Step 1e:

Flow slide possible based on average geometry only?

Total inclination of the channel slope [1:xxx]

Is breaching possible?

 

Yes

25.000

Yes

 

Yes

25.000

Yes

 

OK

0.00 %

OK

Result of the Global check

Fail

Fail

OK

Fictive channel depth Hr [m]1825.5241431825.5241430.00 %
Fictive slope cotan αr10.5141410.50.00 % 
Max. allowable retrogression length Lallowable [m]60600.00 %
Probability of preventing a liquefaction P(ZV) [/km/year] 61.52 44 × 10-5661.52 44 × 10-560.00 %
Reliability index β-0.773-
P(L > Lallowable)25.20 00 × 10-125.20 00 × 10-10.23 %
Probability of flood damage by liquefaction P(falen|ZV) [/year]17.43 18 × 10-57 1 7.43 18 × 10-570.18 %
Allowable probability of failure [/year]2.50 × 10-6 2.50 × 10-60.00 %

Result of the Detailed check 

FailPassFail

Pass

OK 
Overall resultFailWarningFail

Warning

OK 

 

Results of benchmark 3-1 for case F:

...