...
| Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error |
|---|---|---|---|
Step 1a: Would flow slide lead to damage on levee? Marge [m] Slope [1:xxx] Assessment level [m + NAP] |
No 30.000 15.000 -10.000 |
No 30.000 15.000 -10.000 |
OK 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % |
| Step 1c: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? | No | No | OK |
Step 1d: Flow slide possible based on criteria "steepest slope aver 5m" ? Average slope over a height of at least 5 m [1:xxx] |
No 6 |
No 6 |
OK 0.00 % |
Step 1e: Flow slide possible based on average geometry only? Total inclination of the channel slope [1:xxx] Is breaching possible? |
Yes 6 Yes |
Yes 6 Yes |
OK 0.00 % OK |
Result of the Global check | Pass | Pass | OK |
| Fictive channel depth Hr [m] | 19.087 | 19.087 | 0.00 % |
| Fictive slope cotan αr [-] | 23.000 | 23.000 | 0.00 % |
| Max. allowable retrogression length Lallowable [m] | 150.000 | 150.000 | 0.00% |
| Probability of occurence P(ZV) [/year] | 3.66 × 10-7 | 3.66 × 10-7 | 0.00 % |
| Reliability index critical length β | - | 39.999 | - |
| Probability P(L > Lallowable) [/year] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 % |
| Probability of flood damage by liquefaction P(falen|ZV) [/year] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 % |
...
| Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Step 1a: Would flow slide lead to damage on levee? Marge [m] Slope [1:xxx] Assessment level [m + NAP] |
Yes 30.000 15.000 -10.000 |
Yes 30.000 15.000 -10.000 |
OK 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % | |||
| Step 1c: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? | Yes | Yes | OK | |||
Step 1d: Flow slide possible based on criteria "steepest slope aver 5m" ? Average slope over a height of at least 5 m [1:xxx] |
No 6 |
No 6 |
OK 0.00 % | |||
Step 1e: Flow slide possible based on average geometry only? Total inclination of the channel slope [1:xxx] Is breaching possible? |
Yes 6 Yes |
Yes 6 Yes |
OK 0.00 % OK | |||
Result of the Global check | Fail | Fail | OK | |||
| Fictive channel depth Hr [m] | 21.571 | 21.571 | 0.00 % | |||
| Fictive slope cotan αr | 10.5 | 10.5 | 0.00 % | |||
| Max. allowable retrogression length Lallowable [m] | 60 | 60 | 0.00 % | |||
| Probability of preventing a liquefaction P(ZV) [/year] | 4.94 × 10-7 | 4.94 × 10-7 | 0.00 % | |||
| Reliability index β | - | 1.712 | - | |||
| P(L > Lallowable) [/year] | 4.34 × 10-2 | 4.34 × 10-2 | 0.00 % | |||
| Probability of flood damage by liquefaction P(falen|ZV) [/year] | 2.15× 10-8 | 2.15 × 10-8 | 0.00 %Allowable probability of failure [/year] | 2.50 × 10-6 | 2.50 × 10-6 | 0.00 % |
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case C:
| Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error |
|---|---|---|---|
Step 1a: Would flow slide lead to damage on levee? Marge [m] Slope [1:xxx] Assessment level [m + NAP] |
Yes 28.016 15.000 -10.331 |
Yes 28.016 15.000 -10.331 |
OK 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % |
| Step 1c: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? | No | No | OK |
Step 1d: Flow slide possible based on criteria "steepest slope aver 5m" ? Average slope over a height of at least 5 m [1:xxx] |
Yes 3.901 |
Yes 3.901 |
OK 0.00 % |
Step 1e: Flow slide possible based on average geometry only? Total inclination of the channel slope [1:xxx] Is breaching possible? |
Yes 7.395 Yes |
Yes 7.395 Yes |
OK 0.00 % OK |
Result of the Global check | Fail | Fail | OK |
| Fictive channel depth Hr [m] | 23.791 | 23.791 | 0.00 % |
| Fictive slope cotan αr | 8.413 | 8.413 | 0.00 % |
| Max. allowable retrogression length Lallowable [m] | 60 | 60 | 0.00 % |
| Probability of preventing a liquefaction P(ZV) [/km/year] | 57.63 04 × 10-85 | 7.63 04 × 10-8 | 0.00 % |
| Reliability index β | - | -1.334 | - |
| P(L > Lallowable) [/year] | 9.09 × 10-1 | 9.09 × 10-1 | 0.00 % |
| Probability of flood damage by liquefaction P(falen|ZV) [/year] | 56.12 40 × 10-85 | 6.12 40 × 10-8 | 0.00 % |
| Allowable probability of failure [/year] | 2.50 × 10-6 | 2.50 × 10-6 | 0.00 % |
Result of the Detailed check | Pass | Pass | OK |
| Overall result | Warning | Warning | OK |
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case D:
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case D:
|
|---|
| Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error |
|---|---|---|---|
Step 1a: Would flow slide lead to damage on levee? Marge [m] Slope [1:xxx] Assessment level [m + NAP] |
Yes 30.000 15.000 -10.000 |
Yes 30.000 15.000 -10.000 |
OK 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % |
| Step 1c: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? | No | No | OK |
Step 1d: Flow slide possible based on criteria "steepest slope aver 5m" ? Average slope over a height of at least 5 m [1:xxx] |
No 6 |
No 6 |
OK 0.00 % |
Step 1e: Flow slide possible based on average geometry only? Total inclination of the channel slope [1:xxx] Is breaching possible? |
Yes 6 No |
Yes 6 No |
OK 0.00 % OK |
Result of the Global check | Fail | Fail | OK |
| Fictive channel depth Hr [m] | 21.571 | 25.571 | 0.00 % |
| Fictive slope cotan αr | 10.500 | 10.500 | 0.00 % |
| Max. allowable retrogression length Lallowable [m] | 60 | 60 | 0.00 % |
| Probability of preventing a liquefaction P(ZV) [/km/year] | 34.92 90 × 10-73 | 4.92 × 90 × 10-7 | 0.00 % |
| Reliability index β | - | 1.712 | - |
| P(L > Lallowable) [/year] | 4.34 × 10-2 | 4.34 × 10-2 | 0.00 % |
| Probability of flood damage by liquefaction P(falen|ZV) [/year] | 12.70 × 13 × 10-8 | 12.70 13 × 10-8 | 0.00 % |
| Allowable probability of failure [/year] | 2.50 × 10-6 | 2.50 × 10-6 | 0.00 % |
Result of the Detailed check | Pass | Pass | OK |
| Overall result | Pass | Pass | OK |
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case E:
...