Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

As a rule, any Master Controller is in charge of running its own tasks. In addition, it takes over Failover tasks for which the owner is not visibly producing heartbeats indicating its health, and where no other healthy Master Controllers with better failover priority (lower value) are available. Each Master Controller has its own list of failover priorities, deciding which Master Controller becomes the next top MC in a Failover situation. For best behaviour, it is recommended to list all Master Controllers that are visible in the list of Failover Priorities. In order to prevent the local Master Controller becoming the top Master Controller for taking over its own "Suspend duty in Failover" Tasks in case of a manual failover,  it is common to specify all other Master Controllers first, and put the local Master Controllers' Failover Priority last.

Example:

MCFailover priorities order (ordered highest rank to lowest rank)Example
MC00MC01, MC02, MC00

Three Master Controllers in a single synchronization pool with:

  1. MC00 and MC01 owning failover tasks,
  2. MC02 has to take over when MC00 or MC01 are gone

...

MC00MC01, MC02, MC00
  1. MC02 is not owning any Failover Tasks.
MCFailover priorities order (ordered highest rank to lowest rank)Remarks

Each MC that is not in Failover mode can become top MC for Failover Tasks owned by other MCs as soon as  as no recent heartbeats (5 minutes threshold) are received from the higher ordered remote MCs younger than 5 minutes.



MC01MC00, MC02, MC01
MC02MC00, MC01, MC02

...