Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Group

File name

Title

Global

Simple CUR-113

Detailled (TR)

Advanced-SLIQ2D

1

bm1-1

Study Case described in "Technisch Rapport Voorland Zettingsvloeiing"

Failed

 

Passed

 

2

bm2-1

Spui dike - hmp 63.5 9 (location Nieuw Beijerland)

Failed

 

Passed Failed

 

2  

bm2-2

Spui dike - hmp 65.0 (between locations Oud Beijerland and Nieuw Beijerland)

Failed Passed

 

Passed

 

2  

bm2-3

Spui dike - hmp 67.8 (locationoud Beijerland)

  Failed

  

Passed(warning)

 

3

bm3-1

Global check with traject: step 1 = no, step 3 = yes

 

 

 

 

3  

bm3-2

Global check with traject: step 1 = no, step 3 = no

 

 

 

 

3  

bm3-3

Global check with traject:

 

 

 

 

4

bm4-1

Test on the level indicator

 

 

 

 

5

bm5-1a

Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case LGZM1

 

 

 

Advanced-SLIQ2D ( Failed )

5  

bm5-1b

Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case LGZM2

 

 

 

Advanced-SLIQ2D ( Failed )

5  

bm5-1c

Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case LGZM3

 

 

 

Advanced-SLIQ2D ( Failed )

5  

bm5-1d

Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case LGZM4

 

 

 

Advanced-SLIQ2D ( Failed )

5  

bm5-1e

Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case SIMPLETA

 

 

 

Advanced-SLIQ2D ( Failed )

5  

bm5-1f

Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case LG1D5N5H

 

 

 

Advanced-SLIQ2D ( Failed )

5  

bm5-1g

Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case HBPZBUI3

 

 

 

Failed

 

bm5-2

Comparison with DZettingsVloeiing - Study Case described in "Technisch Rapport Voorland Zettingsvloeiing"

 

 

Passed

 

(warning) According to hand-calculation, the Advanced

...

check passes but according to D-Flow Slide it fails.

Group 1: Benchmarks from literature (exact solution)

...

This section uses the results of a by-hand calculation performed for three profiles of the Spui dike project (see figure below):

  • hmp 63.5 9 (Nieuw Beijerland)
  • hmp 65.0 (between Oud Beijerland and Nieuw Beijerland)
  • hmp 67.8 (oud Beijerland)

XXX Insert figure

As the details of the calculation performed by hand are not available, those benchmarks are set in group 2.

hmp 63.

...

9 (Nieuw Beijerland)

Description

The dike profile at hmp 63.9 is given in the figure below.
XXX Insert figure
The soil profile and the material properties are given in the following table:

Level top layer (m NAP)

Material

Formation

Material sensitive to liquefaction

D r (%)

n (%)

n min (%)

n max (%)

Gamma unsat (kN/m 3)

Gamma sat (kN/m 3)

Gamma grains (kN/m 3)

D 50 (mm)

D 15 (mm)

Phi (deg)

c (kPa)

Eps voldm0

s max

s 2

k so (kN/m 2)

m

r

u

v

Grond level

Clay

Dunkirk / anthropogenic

No

 

 

 

 

18

18

26.5

 

 

25

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-0.5

Clay/Sand

Dunkirk

No

 

 

 

 

18

18

26.5

 

 

25

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-6.5

Peat

Holland

No

 

 

 

 

10

10

26.5

 

 

25

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-7.5

Clay

Calais

No

 

 

 

 

18

18

26.5

 

 

25

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-8.5

Sand clayey/Sand

Calais

Yes

35

45

36.5

49.5

19

19

26.5

160

80

25

0

0.00044

1.575

1.2

43.2

3

7

1.2

1

-9.5

Sand

Calais

Yes

35

45

36.5

49.5

19

19

26.5

160

80

25

0

0.00044

1.575

1.2

43.2

3

7

1.2

1

-12.5

Sand

Calais

Yes

35

45

36.5

49.5

19

19

26.5

160

80

25

0

0.00044

1.575

1.2

43.2

3

7

1.2

1

-18

Sand

Pleistocene

Yes

35

45

36.5

49.5

19

19

26.5

160

80

25

0

0.00044

1.575

1.2

43.2

3

7

1.2

1

Benchmark results
D-FLOW SLIDE results

...