...
Group | File name | Input file | Input file | Input file | Title | Global (VTV) | Simple (CUR-113) | Detailed (TR) | Advanced (SLIQ2D) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | bm1-1 |
|
|
| Study Case described in "Technisch Rapport Voorland Zettingsvloeiing" | Insufficient / Insufficient => |
| Sufficient / Sufficient => |
|
2 | bm2-1 |
|
|
| Spui dike - hmp 63.9 (location Nieuw Beijerland) | Insufficient / Insufficient => |
| Insufficient / Insufficient => |
|
| bm2-2 |
|
|
| Spui dike - hmp 65.0 (between locations Oud Beijerland and Nieuw Beijerland) | Sufficient / Sufficient => |
| Sufficient / Sufficient => |
|
| bm2-3 |
|
|
| Spui dike - hmp 67.8 (location Oud Beijerland) | Insufficient / Insufficient => |
| Insufficient / Sufficient => |
|
3 | bm3-1 |
|
|
| Global check with traject: step 1 = no, step 3 = yes |
|
|
|
|
| bm3-2 |
|
|
| Global check with traject: step 1 = no, step 3 = no |
|
|
|
|
| bm3-3 |
|
|
| Global check with traject: |
|
|
|
|
4 | bm4-1 |
|
|
| Test on the level indicator |
|
|
|
|
5 | bm5-1a |
|
|
| Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case LGZM1 |
|
|
| Insufficient / Insufficient => |
| bm5-1b |
|
|
| Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case LGZM2 |
|
|
| Insufficient / Insufficient => |
| bm5-1c |
|
|
| Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case LGZM3 |
|
|
| Insufficient / Insufficient => |
| bm5-1d |
|
|
| Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case LGZM4 |
|
|
| Insufficient / Insufficient => |
| bm5-1e |
|
|
| Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case SIMPLETA |
|
|
| Insufficient / Insufficient => |
| bm5-1f |
|
|
| Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case LG1D5N5H |
|
|
| Insufficient / Insufficient => |
| bm5-1g |
|
|
| Comparison with SLIQ2D - Case HBPZBUI3 |
|
|
| Insufficient / Insufficient => |
| bm5-2 |
|
|
| Comparison with SLIQ2D-Windows - 2 layers partially saturated with fixed slope angle |
|
| Sufficient / Sufficient => |
|
| bm5-3 |
|
|
| Comparison with DZettingsVloeiing - Study Case described in "Technisch Rapport Voorland Zettingsvloeiing" |
|
| Sufficient / Sufficient => |
|
...
5.2 Comparison with SLIQ2D-Windows - 2 layers partially saturated with fixed slope angle
Description
This benchmark is intended to verify the advanced method by comparing D-FLOW SLIDE results with those from the older program SLIQ2D-Windows, for a 21 m height channel composed of 2 layers where the top layer is partially saturated. The slope of the channel is fixed to 1:3.333 (i.e. Tan Alpha = 0.3).
Layer | Height (m) | Soil type | n (%) | n min (%) | n max (%) | Eps voldm0 | m | r | s 2 | s max | v | k so (kN/m 2) | u | Unit weight (kN/m 3) | D r (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Top sand | 12 | Sand clay | 45.5 | 50 | 35 | 0.006 | 1.7 | 7 | 1.28 | 1.7 | 1 | 50000 | 1 | 8.856 | 30 |
Bottom sand | 9 | Sand clay | 47.4 | 50 | 37 | 0.0092 | 3 | 5 | 1.23 | 1.35 | 1.25 | 39460 | 1.33 | 6.312 | 20 |
Benchmark results
Results of SLIQ2D-Windows for bm5-2 - Overview of the unstable points:
Results of SLIQ2D-Windows for bm5-2 - Values of the critical slope angle for each calculated point:
D-FLOW SLIDE results
Results between SLIQ2D-Windows and D-FLOW SLIDE are exactly the same for the tangent angle, as show in the table below.
xxx