...
Adrian Harper, Innovyze Ltd (adrian.harper@innovyze.com)
Stef Hummel, Deltares (stef.hummel@deltares.nl)
Standa Vanecek, DHI (s.vanecek@dhi.cz)
Peter Schade, Bundesanstalt fuer Wasserbau (peter.schade(at)baw.de)
Rob Knapen, Alterra, Wageningen UR (Rob.Knapen@wur.nl)
~jgr@dhigroup.com, DHI (jgr@dhigroup.com)
Apologies:
-
...
Fluid Earth SDK/Pipistrelle
status?Adrian will start to work on it from next Monday, tree days a week. Working prototype will be available around mid July.
After that, Pipistrelle will be done after that (Adrian has gained quite a bit of experience with the dotSpatial component, can replace the activeX component in Pipistrelle.
The Fluid Earth SDK and Pipistrelle will also be tested on Linux/MONO.
Rob has a Mac with MONO, he will test it on a Mac.
OATC C# SDK/GUI
Deltares indeed is using the current OATC SDK.
See also previous meetings on actions yet to be taken on the SDK Things work fine, but the models for now only have simple id-based input en output exchange items.
Oatc Java SDK/GUI
Rob is working on the SDK starting with easy test cases.
...
Robert Szczepanek, the developer from Poland is a private member now from the Association. We can invite him to the OATC. We could arrange a specific session on his Python work.
Standa will ask him wether he would like that.
Started to work a Python version of OpenMI.
Jesper makes Mike SHE OpenMI 2 compliant, leading to bug fixes in the SDK.
Rob is writing an OpenMI article for a thematic issue of the "Environmental Modelling and Software" journal.
The BAW has ported its LinkableComponent GEIWrapper to Windows 64bit. The integration of a netCDF 4 reader is planned.
The EGU 2011 poster is available under http://presentations.copernicus.org/EGU2011-7904_presentation.pdf .
Web based model integration meeting in Birmingham. Dan Dan Cornford (Aston Univ. Birmingham) was asking about the latest version of the java code, to do some work on the web services possibilities of OpenMI.
(Left from previous meeting: an An OATC email address was suggested, something like oatc@openmi.org or technical@openmi.org. Standa will contact the OAEC in that question.
Extrapolation of span values
Consider the picture below, having two spans in the buffer, namely:
Span 0-1 : value 1
Span 1-2 : value 2
If asking for an extrapolated value for the span 2-3, we would expect to get the value 3 (the dashed line in the figure below). But you could also argue to return the value 2.5.
The difference between the two, is than in the former the extrapolation line is assumed to be a line through the center of the spans, while the latter assumes a line starting at the end of the last span, and having the same slope as the line through the centers.
Which to use?
Jesper will use the dashed line approach.
Next meeting
)
Holiday Scheme's
Adrian: not clear yet
Jesper: wk 28, wk 30-31
Peter: wk 27-29
Rob: wk 28-29
Stef: wk 30, wk 32
Next meeting
Date to be determined by means of a Doodle plannerSkype meeting in principle on 15th June, 14:00 CEST, Stef has to agree.