...
| Unit | Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Marge | [m] | 353035 | 30 | 0.00% |
X coordinate of the observation profile (Xsign)Slope | [m-]-35 | 15 | -3515 | 0.00% |
X coordinate of the liquefaction point (XZV)Assessment level | [m] | 30-1030 | -10 | 0.00% |
Question 1a : Would flow slide lead to damage on levee? |
| Yes | Yes | OK |
| Question 1b: Criterion on slope protection met (<1:2,5)? | - | - | ||
Question 1c: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreland? |
| No | No | OK |
Question 1d: Flow slide possible based on criterion "steepest slope over 5 m"? |
| YesNoYes | No | OK |
| Question 1e: Flow slide possible based on average geometry only? | ||||
Result of the Global check |
| Failed | Failed | OK |
...
| Unit | Benchmark | D-FLOW SLIDE | Relative error | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fictive channel depth (Hr) | [m] | 21.571 | 21.571 | 0.00 % | |||||
Fictive slope (cotan αr) | [-] | 10.500 | 10.500 | 0.00 % | Probability of liquefaction | [-] | Not checked | ||
β | [-] | 3.749 | 3.749 | 0.00 % | P(L > Lallowable) | [-] | Not checked|||
Probability of failure | [-] | Not checked | |||||||
Allowable probability of failure | [-] | 2.50 × 1E-06 | 2.50 × 1E-06 | 0.00 % | Result of Detailed Check |
| Not checked|||
1.2. Determination of the steepest possible breaching profile (step 7 of the Global check)
...