You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

Unknown macro: {table}
Unknown macro: {table-row}
Unknown macro: {table-cell}

The effect of hard structures on dune erosion, modelling of a New Jersey case

<insert picture>

\section

Unknown macro: {Relevance}

\label

Unknown macro: {relevance}

The most densely populated areas in the Netherlands lie below \ac

Unknown macro: {MSL}

. These areas are protected by the coastal dune system.  The importance of this dune system is reflected by the extensive collection of Dutch regulations that ensure the safety level of the dunes \citep

Unknown macro: {ENW2007}

. The federal water act states for example that every six year the safety of all primary water defenses need to be assessed. Currently however it is not precisely known to what extent hard structures have impact on this level of safety.
On top of the assessment of safety of the current system, the Delta Commissioner suggested the idea of multifunctional coastal systems. \cite

Unknown macro: {Ellen2011}

explored the possibilities of applying several functions to the coastal area and stated that multifunctional use of this system could be possible, but for that there is more fundamental knowledge needed about the behavior of hard structures in these coastal areas.
In order to increase our knowledge of the effects of hard structures, measurements are necessary. In the Netherlands these measurements are however scarce. Other options to obtain cases for validation are numerical desk studies, large scale flume experiments or by looking abroad. 
\section

Unknown macro: {Problem description}

Researchers have been studied the response of 'soft' coastal system during storm conditions for the last three decades. The DUROS+ model \citep

Unknown macro: {VanGent2008}

is the prescribed model in the Netherlands for the safety assessment of the dunes. In situations where the safety assessment with the DUROS-model are not adequate, administrators can decide to use more generic models. Several comparisons between process-based models like XBeach \citep

Unknown macro: {Roelvink2009}

or DUROSTA \citep

Unknown macro: {Steetzel1993a}

have been carried out \citep

Unknown macro: {VanThieldeVries2009a, DenHeijer2013}

. It is therefore fair to say that the processes involved with the soft response of the dune are relativity well understood.
This level of knowledge is not present for the impact of 'hard' elements during storm surges or the influence of hard-soft transitions on the amount of observed erosion. The effects that have been observed:
\begin

Unknown macro: {enumerate}

\item Cross-shore. Experiments \citep

Unknown macro: {Steetzel1987}

have shown that scour holes, both in front as behind hard elements, develop during storm surges.  These effects have been reproduced in the process-based model XBeach \citep

Unknown macro: {VanThieldeVries2009}

.
\item Longshore. Flume experiments \citep

Unknown macro: {Boers2008}

have shown that at the sides of hard elements an increase in erosion can be distinguished. These effects have been reproduced in the process-based model XBeach \citep

Unknown macro: {Geer2012}

. In order to describe this effect calculation rules are derived to determine the increase in dune retreat \citep

Unknown macro: {Boers2013a}

.
\end

In order to understand, validate and evaluate the relations described, measurements are necessary.   
\section

Unknown macro: {Objective}

The objective of this thesis is to get a better understanding of the effects of hard element on erosion process during storm surges. This will be done by validating the existing knowledge, calculations rules and models against a case study.
s\section

\label

Unknown macro: {relevance}

The most densely populated areas in the Netherlands lie below \ac

Unknown macro: {MSL}

. These areas are protected by the coastal dune system.  The importance of this dune system is reflected by the extensive collection of Dutch regulations that ensure the safety level of the dunes \citep

Unknown macro: {ENW2007}

. The federal water act states for example that every six year the safety of all primary water defenses need to be assessed. Currently however it is not precisely known to what extent hard structures have impact on this level of safety.

On top of the assessment of safety of the current system, the Delta Commissioner suggested the idea of multifunctional coastal systems. \cite

Unknown macro: {Ellen2011}

explored the possibilities of applying several functions to the coastal area and stated that multifunctional use of this system could be possible, but for that there is more fundamental knowledge needed about the behavior of hard structures in these coastal areas.

In order to increase our knowledge of the effects of hard structures, measurements are necessary. In the Netherlands these measurements are however scarce. Other options to obtain cases for validation are numerical desk studies, large scale flume experiments or by looking abroad. 

\section

Unknown macro: {Problem description}

Researchers have been studied the response of 'soft' coastal system during storm conditions for the last three decades. The DUROS+ model \citep

Unknown macro: {VanGent2008}

is the prescribed model in the Netherlands for the safety assessment of the dunes. In situations where the safety assessment with the DUROS-model are not adequate, administrators can decide to use more generic models. Several comparisons between process-based models like XBeach \citep

Unknown macro: {Roelvink2009}

or DUROSTA \citep

Unknown macro: {Steetzel1993a}

have been carried out \citep

Unknown macro: {VanThieldeVries2009a, DenHeijer2013}

. It is therefore fair to say that the processes involved with the soft response of the dune are relativity well understood.

This level of knowledge is not present for the impact of 'hard' elements during storm surges or the influence of hard-soft transitions on the amount of observed erosion. The effects that have been observed:

\begin

Unknown macro: {enumerate}

\item Cross-shore. Experiments \citep

Unknown macro: {Steetzel1987}

have shown that scour holes, both in front as behind hard elements, develop during storm surges.  These effects have been reproduced in the process-based model XBeach \citep

Unknown macro: {VanThieldeVries2009}

.

\item Longshore. Flume experiments \citep

Unknown macro: {Boers2008}

have shown that at the sides of hard elements an increase in erosion can be distinguished. These effects have been reproduced in the process-based model XBeach \citep

Unknown macro: {Geer2012}

. In order to describe this effect calculation rules are derived to determine the increase in dune retreat \citep

Unknown macro: {Boers2013a}

.

\end

In order to understand, validate and evaluate the relations described, measurements are necessary.   

\section

Unknown macro: {Objective}

The objective of this thesis is to get a better understanding of the effects of hard element on erosion process during storm surges. This will be done by validating the existing knowledge, calculations rules and models against a case study.

Unknown macro: {table-row}
Unknown macro: {table-cell}

Info:

<profile picture>

Name

Kees Nederhoff

Email

Kees.Nederhoff@Deltares.nl

Room

Tetra 2B

Software package

XBeach

Start Date

March 2014

Specialisation Programme

Coastal Engineering

Deltares supervisors

Marien Boers
Joost den Bieman
Ap van Dongeren

TU Delft professor

Marcel Stive

  • No labels