Group 3: Benchmarks from spreadsheets
This section uses tests performed by hand or by means of an Excel spreadsheet.
3.1 Global check with all possible trajectories
Description
This benchmark tests all possible trajectories according to the Global check. Those trajectories are:
- Case A: step 1 = No → Global check passed
- Case B: step 1 = Yes, step 2 = No, step 4 = No → Global check passed
- Case C: step 1 = Yes, step 2 = No, step 4 = Yes, step 5 = No → Global check passed
- Case D: step 1 = Yes, step 2 = No, step 4 = Yes, step 5 = Yes → Global check failed
- Case E: step 1 = Yes, step 2 = Yes → Global check failed
The same geometry as benchmark 2.1 (see group 2) is used for case A.
Benchmarks results
D-Flow Slide results
D-FLOW SLIDE results are in accordance with the results by hand as show in the table below.
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case A
|
Benchmark |
D-FLOW SLIDE |
Relative error |
|---|---|---|---|
Marge |
xxx |
xxx |
xxx |
X coordinate of the observation profile (Xsign) |
xxx |
xxx |
xxx |
X coordinate of the liquefaction point (XZV) |
xxx |
xxx |
xxx |
Step 1: Is liquefaction damaging on basis of geometry? |
No |
No |
|
Result of the Global check |
Passed |
Passed |
|
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case B
|
Benchmark |
D-FLOW SLIDE |
Relative error |
|---|---|---|---|
Marge |
xxx |
xxx |
xxx |
X coordinate of the observation profile (Xsign) |
xxx |
xxx |
xxx |
X coordinate of the liquefaction point (XZV) |
xxx |
xxx |
xxx |
Step 1: Is liquefaction damaging on basis of geometry? |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Step 2: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? |
No |
No |
|
Step 4: Is liquefaction possible on the basis of the geometry? |
No |
No |
|
Result of the Global check |
Passed |
Passed |
|
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case C
|
Benchmark |
D-FLOW SLIDE |
Relative error |
|---|---|---|---|
Marge |
xxx |
xxx |
xxx |
X coordinate of the observation profile (Xsign) |
xxx |
xxx |
xxx |
X coordinate of the liquefaction point (XZV) |
xxx |
xxx |
xxx |
Step 1: Is liquefaction damaging on basis of geometry? |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Step 2: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? |
No |
No |
|
Step 4: Is liquefaction possible on the basis of the geometry? |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Step 5: Are there any sensitive to liquefaction layers present? |
No |
No |
|
Result of the Global check |
Passed |
Passed |
|
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case D
|
Benchmark |
D-FLOW SLIDE |
Relative error |
|---|---|---|---|
Marge |
xxx |
xxx |
xxx |
X coordinate of the observation profile (Xsign) |
xxx |
xxx |
xxx |
X coordinate of the liquefaction point (XZV) |
xxx |
xxx |
xxx |
Step 1: Is liquefaction damaging on basis of geometry? |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Step 2: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? |
No |
No |
|
Step 4: Is liquefaction possible on the basis of the geometry? |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Step 5: Are there any sensitive to liquefaction layers present? |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Result of the Global check |
Failed |
Failed |
|
Results of benchmark 3-1 for case E
|
Benchmark |
D-FLOW SLIDE |
Relative error |
|---|---|---|---|
Marge |
xxx |
xxx |
xxx |
X coordinate of the observation profile (Xsign) |
xxx |
xxx |
xxx |
X coordinate of the liquefaction point (XZV) |
xxx |
xxx |
xxx |
Step 1: Is liquefaction damaging on basis of geometry? |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Step 2: Artificially underwater installed and non-compacted sandy foreshore? |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Result of the Global check |
Failed |
Failed |
|
